MONTE WALSH (NGP, 1970)
DIRECTOR: William A. Fraker; PRODUCERS: Hal Landers and Bobby Roberts; WRITERS: David Z. Goodman and Lucas Heller from story by Jack Schafer; CINEMATOGRAPHY: David M. Walsh
CAST: Lee
Marvin, Jeanne Moreau, Jack Palance, Mitchell Ryan, Jim Davis, G.D. Spradlin,
John Hudkins, Raymond Guth, John McKee, Michael Conrad, Tom Heaton, Ted
Gehring, Bo Hopkins, John McLiam, Allyn Ann McLerie, Matt Clark, Billy Green
Bush, Eric Christmas, Charles Tyner, Richard Farnsworth, Guy Wilkerson, Roy
Barcroft
“The good times are
coming
They’ll be coming
real soon
And I’m not just
pitching pennies at the moon”
(NOTE: Earlier
I wrote about my introduction to MONTE
WALSH and if you wish, you may read about it here)
THE PLOT.
This underrated and unappreciated classic
film is the best depiction of the hardship, humdrum drudgery, good humor, and
camaraderie of cowboy life ever filmed.
Railroad expansion has made the long cattle
drive obsolete; the open range has been fenced in; and a bitterly harsh winter
has forced the local ranchers to sell out to a corporation, the Consolidated
Land Company. The land company, like
corporations everywhere, does not possess a conscience. Accountants are in charge, money has become
capital, and the primary concern is the bottom line.
All these factors have a
basis in historical reality, including the harsh winter. Blizzards in the 1880s bankrupted many
ranchers and exerted a long-range transformative effect on Western cattle
ranching.
Sadly, these events conspire to make the
cowboy – or most of them, anyway -- obsolete.
Nevertheless, two aging cowboys
(Marvin and Palance) try to continue as though nothing has changed, but the
economic forces of the era are working against them. In the short run, they are more fortunate
than some of the other cowhands.
Cal
Brennan (Davis), the former owner of the Slash Y, is now an employee of the
land company. As ranch manager, he is
forced by the company’s absentee property owners to downsize the workforce. He does so by laying-off the younger men,
which allows Monte (Marvin) and Chet (Palance) a reprieve – at least for the
time being.
“I’m not about to come unhinged when everything goes wrong
A fact is something to be faced
But not for very long”
A fact is something to be faced
But not for very long”
Monte is an
optimist, one could say an idealist. No
matter what bad things come his way, and many bad things do, he nevertheless
retains his optimism. Many idealists
become cynics when events transpire against them and their ideals do not carry
the day, but not Monte.
He loses
everything that he cherishes, his friends, especially Chet, the woman he loves,
and is on the verge of losing his way of life, but he never gives up the battle
to retain his self-respect, his optimism, or his sense of humor, even though he
is reduced to telling stories to his horse in the film’s final scene.
Chet, on the other hand, is more pragmatic than his partner. He has seen the handwriting on the wall and finally realizes that it is time to accept reality and to adjust accordingly.
Chet, on the other hand, is more pragmatic than his partner. He has seen the handwriting on the wall and finally realizes that it is time to accept reality and to adjust accordingly.
The most poignant moment in what is a very poignant film occurs when
Chet finally concedes and decides to quit cowboy life and marry a town widow
(McLerie) who owns a hardware store:
MONTE WALSH (Lee
Marvin): “Cowboys don’t get married,
unless they stop being cowboys.”
CHET ROLLINS (Jack
Palance): “Nobody gets to be a cowboy
forever.”
How true, but
how sad.
“I ain’t doin’ nothin’ I can’t do from my horse.” – MONTE WALSH (Lee Marvin)
Shorty Austin
(Ryan), a buddy to Monte and Chet, is one of the younger cowboys who
loses his job. He teams up with a couple
of other men (Bush and Clark) who are in the same fix. The trio of ex-cowhands respond to the
changing times by taking to the outlaw trail with tragic consequences for Chet
and Monte.
There isn’t a
lot of action or violence or gunplay in MONTE WALSH. It is a character-driven story that spends
the first half of the movie establishing the characters and the changing
circumstances they must confront. The
lack of action is the primary reason that some critics have been negative in
their reviews. But there is a great deal
to like, including outstanding performances by the cast, good direction and
writing, and stunning location photography.
Colin over at Riding the High Country perfectly summarizes the movie’s appeal when he writes,
“[t]his is a remarkable film, a work of gentle and understated power, one which
can break your heart and yet fill it up with renewed optimism at the same
time.”
THE STARS.
Ironically,
Marvin, in THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY
VALANCE (Ford/Paramount, 1962), and Palance, in SHANE (Paramount, 1953), gave us two of the meanest, most
unredeemable, and most memorable bad guys ever to appear on the screen. But here they are excellent in good-guy roles.
Roger Ebert wrote in the Chicago Sun-Times:
“The
performances are extraordinary. Marvin
has very seldom been better; he leaves in the toughness of his usual screen
character, but he also reveals a lot of depth….[Y]ou’re reminded once again what
a good actor Palance is, and how seldom he gets the opportunity to prove it.”
However, here
is another view.
Vincent Canby
wrote in his review of the film in the New York Times that MONTE WALSH “is
not a very good movie, but one that is often appealing in its individual parts.”
He is also critical
of Marvin’s performance:
“I suppose that
Marvin seemed like an excellent choice for the title role. He is tough, grizzled, a little crazy, but he
is also turning professionally cute, given to comic mannerisms that are
beginning to remind me more and more of Andy Clyde—but this may be because the
film includes a rather exuberant outhouse routine.”
Andy
Clyde? Come now, Mr. Canby. Furthermore, just how is it that Andy Clyde
and “a rather exuberant outhouse routine” are related?
Canby has
better things to say about Palance, Moreau, and Ryan, but also complains that
the story’s principal villains, the property owners, are 2,500 miles away, off
screen, and communicate via letter and telegraph.
Well, that’s
the way it really was.
“The good times are
coming
When they come I’ll be
there
With both my feet
planted in mid-air”
One of the great strengths of the film is how well Marvin and Palance relate to each other. That could be because they knew each other quite well, having appeared together in two films before this one. In 1956, Palance, in an electrifying performance, starred in the intense WWII drama, ATTACK! (UA, directed by Robert Aldrich), with Lee Marvin very good in a supporting role.
A decade later,
after his Oscar winning performance in CAT
BALLOU (Columbia, 1965) had elevated him to leading man status , Marvin
starred with Burt Lancaster in THE
PROFESSIONALS (Columbia, 1966, directed by Richard Brooks), with Palance in
a supporting role.
In the realm of
what might have been, I have read that Marvin turned down a role in THE WILD BUNCH (WB, 1969) in order to star
in PAINT YOUR WAGON (Paramount, 1969), the film he appeared in just prior to MONTE
WALSH. I suppose it seemed to be a good idea at the time.
Jeanne Moreau gives
a touching performance as Martine Benard, a prostitute who loves Monte, but
understands that marriage is probably not in their future.
In their scenes together, it is obvious that
there is some real chemistry between Moreau and Marvin. She was later quoted as saying, “Lee Marvin
is more male than anyone I have ever acted with. He is the greatest man’s man I have ever met
and that includes all the European stars I have worked with.”
In the course
of her career, Jeanne Moreau acted in more than a hundred movies and dozens of
plays and she was a huge star – especially in Europe.
In 2001, Jeff
Galipeaux wrote on the Salon website that Moreau “is the
heavyweight of 60s cinema, and so far, the last of the heavyweights. In the decades since Moreau’s heyday, many
fine welterweights have come up through the ranks…but no one who could have
handled her run of 60s films with the intelligence, wisdom, range and
unself-consciousness she conveys with preternatural ease.”
THE SUPPORTING CAST.
The stars have much able support beginning
with Mitchell Ryan, in only his third feature film, and Jim Davis appearing in
his 86th.
Davis, much like John Ireland, was always an effective performer in Westerns. It is hard to figure, but neither got the big break that he deserved. They often gave good performances in supporting roles in bigger-budget productions and were nearly always better than the low-budget movies in which they starred.
three memorable cowboys: (L-R) -- Monte Walsh, Cal Brennan, Chet Rollins |
Davis, much like John Ireland, was always an effective performer in Westerns. It is hard to figure, but neither got the big break that he deserved. They often gave good performances in supporting roles in bigger-budget productions and were nearly always better than the low-budget movies in which they starred.
It was well nigh impossible to make a
Western in the 70s without casting Matt Clark in a supporting role. MONTE WALSH is no exception and Clark is
very good as Rufus Brady, one of the cowboys who respond to hard times by
becoming an outlaw. His partner in
crime, in addition to Shorty Austin (Ryan), is another very good supporting
actor, Billy Green Bush. I really like
his name in this movie: Powder Kent. I
even like the name Billy Green Bush.
"There's gonna be a place for us
A place where we belong
To stand outside just looking in
Has got to be all wrong"
A place where we belong
To stand outside just looking in
Has got to be all wrong"
THE DIRECTOR.
MONTE WALSH was
William Fraker’s first film as director.
It was an impressive debut and showed great promise for the future. However, he directed only two other films.
He was more
interested in cinematography, the job that had made him famous. During his illustrious career, he received
five Academy Award nominations for Best Cinematography.
His expertise in that area is ever apparent
in the outstanding utilization of Arizona locations in MONTE WALSH. He and cinematographer David Walsh teamed to
give us a beautiful film.
What were the
two other films that he directed? Well, that probably should be left unsaid since they certainly didn’t come up to the standards of his debut, that’s for sure.
Roger Greenspun wrote in his review of
Fraker’s second directorial effort, A REFLECTION OF FEAR (Columbia, 1973), that
“there is such a density of atmospheric haze that half the film looks as if it
had been photographed through a
jellyfish.” (Ouch!). It must have
quickly faded into oblivion because I don’t know of anyone who has ever seen
it.
His third film could
not be criticized for its photography, but
unfortunately, he was done in by his
star, the one-and-only Klinton Spilsbury.
Beautifully photographed in New Mexico and Monument Valley, THE LEGEND
OF THE LONE RANGER (Universal, 1981) could not overcome a star whose acting was
so atrocious that his dialogue had to be dubbed by James Keach.
No wonder
Fraker returned full-time to cinematography after that one. He was fortunate to have a fallback position. Klinton Spilsbury didn’t. It was his first and last appearance on the
screen – big or small.
THE WRITERS.
The film’s original source material is an
episodic novel by the same title written by Jack Schaefer, and published in
1963. Schaefer, of course, is known primarily as the author of Shane, a much
more famous book. However, he was quoted
as saying that he thought Monte Walsh was a better novel. I have to agree with him. It is one of my
favorite novels – Western or otherwise.
The screenplay was placed in the capable
hands of David Goodman and Lucas Heller.
They took great liberties in adapting Schaefer’s novel to the extent
that it is possible to enjoy both without one ruining the other. Despite the
differences that exist between the novel and the screenplay, I highly recommend
both.
THE MUSIC.
The film has been criticized by some (Brian
Garfield for one, but not me) for its theme song, “The Good Times are Coming,” which
is sung by Cass Elliott over the opening credits, and at other times during the film.
Personally, I love the song (music by John
Barry and lyrics by Hal David) and I think that it fits the mood of the movie
like a comfortable old shoe. In fact, it
takes days to get it out of my head after hearing it.
Also adding a nice touch are the Charlie
Russell sketches that serve as a backdrop for the opening credits. Cass Elliott and Charlie Russell – now that’s
a winning combination.
******
REVIEWS:
“Generally
underrated, MONTE WALSH is a fine film in its elegiac depiction of real cowboy
life; it’s better and more honest, for example, than the similar WILL PENNY
[Paramount, 1968].” – Brian Garfield in Western
Films: A Complete Guide
“…Marvin and
Palance (a wonderful grin playing across his face for most of the film) give an
example of the inarticulate but good-humored friendship that alleviates the
drudgery of a cowboy’s life.” – Phil Hardy in The Western
And now for an
opposing viewpoint:
“…MONTE WALSH is handled with such meditative
pacing and melodramatic deliberation that it continually threatens to put the
viewer to sleep. Interest is maintained
by Lee Marvin and Jack Palance…who manage to come across as aging ranch
hands….First-time director Fraker managed to conjure up a grimy, naturalistic
view of the dog-eared West that is effective.” – Steven H. Scheuer
Because of superior cinematography, MONTE WALSH is a more enjoyable film if it is viewed on a large movie screen, which I had the privilege of doing. However, it is still a treat on a small screen.
You can watch it on YouTube.
A very good piece indeed, touching on all the important aspects of the film. It's interesting to read the differing viewpoints of various critics, even if I don't agree with some of them.
ReplyDeleteI also liked the way you used the lyrics of the theme song to punctuate the text, much as the music itself does in the movie. I honestly find it hard to see how any criticism could have been leveled at the scoring - Barry did terrific work and, as you noted, the theme song, with its bittersweet optimism, is the ideal accompaniment.
Finally, can I just say thanks for linking in to my own article on the movie - most kind of you.
Colin
No thanks necessary for the link. As you mentioned earlier, we need to do all we can to spread the word on some of the lesser-known, but high quality films such as "Monte Walsh" and "Riding the High Country," for example.
ReplyDeleteAs soon as I complete my "favorite" list (one more to go), I plan to concentrate, as you have, on some of the lesser knowns that have not been analyzed from here to kingdom come.
Speaking of which: Are you familiar with "Bad Company" (1972), starring Jeff Bridges and Barry Brown? It is a film that I always liked, but had never seen in color until recently. My earlier viewings were on late night black-and-white TV. Color doesn't always improve a film, but it certainly did this one.
Thanks for dropping by.
Stormy
Actually, I'm going to have to shamefully admit that you've got me there. I have been told that "Bad Company" is western that's worth tracking down - and it's a recommendation from a few guys whose opinions I very much respect. It's one I guess I need to get round to.
ReplyDeleteThe great thing about the western is the fact that there are always little gems that have passed us by and it's fun to chance upon them and, sometimes, get to pass on that discovery to others. I'm keen to see which "lesser known" movies you pick up on.